Skip to main content

Analyze Assessment Data for Decision Making

Assessment data is only as good as what is done with it. Educators use assessment data to make instructional shifts that best suit learner needs. Data about subgroups of students can inform district programmatic decisions and trigger improvements in targeted services. District-wide data can inform systemic decisions that result in widespread improvements in service delivery.

Practice: The district analyzes assessment data to drive instructional, programmatic, and systemic decisions.

Actions that lead to analyzing assessment data for decision making include:

  • Use assessment data to drive instructional decisions: Assessment data are intentionally used to drive instructional decisions for every student.
  • Use assessment data in programmatic decisions: Assessment data are intentionally used to make programmatic decisions for every student. 
  • Use assessment data to inform systemic decisions: Assessment data are intentionally used to make district-wide improvements.

Learn From Our Partners

Collage of photos and illustrations depicting teaching across different contexts


What Matters Most: Key Practices Guide, National Center on Educational Outcomes

Bristol Township's Story

Photo of the Bristol School District building in PA

Bristol Township School District serves approximately 6,300 students in Levittown, Pennsylvania. The district vision for student learning is focused on building creativity and a “maker mindset” through student-centered and personalized learning. District leaders shared their belief that a “Maker Space is not a physical space but, rather, a mindset, an educational philosophy that puts learning in the hands of students, cultivating a culture where students are creators of their learning outcomes and thereby empowering students to take ownership of their education.” This focus on student-centered and authentic learning requires a shift from focusing on standardized testing and traditional assessments to more holistic and alternative measures of student growth to continue to drive personalized instruction.

District leaders noted the importance of building capacity among students, parents, teachers, and school leaders to understand how to measure student growth and use the data to improve learning, instruction, and programs. Acknowledging the challenges of measuring student learning in a personalized and flexible learning model, the district explored a range of measures, including attendance rate changes, as a way of assessing engagement; behavior patterns; choices that students were making about their science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning pathways; and academic outcomes from project-based learning and embedded digital assessment tools. The district’s instructional coaches provide support to teachers, administrators, students, and families in understanding how the data can provide a holistic picture of student growth and inform changes to classroom instruction as well as schoolwide program improvements. This support for building stakeholder understanding of data has been a critical component of driving personalized instruction in Bristol and in creating systems for recognizing student learning and growth in ways that traditional assessment may miss.

Supporting Research

Borup, J., Chambers, C. B., & Stimson, R. (2019a). Online teacher and on-site facilitator perceptions of parental engagement at a supplemental virtual high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2).

Cosier, M., Gomez, A., McKee, A., Maghzi, K. S. (2013). Smart phones permitted: How teachers use text messaging to collaborate. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 347–358.

Mac Iver, M.A., Sheldon, S., & Clark, E. (2021) Widening the portal: How schools can help more families access and use the parent portal to support student success. Middle School Journal, 52:1, 14-22, 

Valerie, L. M., & Foss-Swanson, S. (2012). Using family message journals to improve student writing and strengthen the school–home partnership. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(3), 40–48.

Top of Page